Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Butler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1935No. 25643. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beals, J. —

J. W. and Emma K. Butler, husband and wife, September 10, 1931, executed a joint and several promissory note, whereby they promised to pay to the order of J. E. Kelley $421.21, with interest. About a year thereafter, Mr. Butler died intestate, and his widow was regularly appointed administratrix of his estate. The then holder of the promissory note filed with the administratrix its verified claim, based on the note, which claim was allowed in the full amount thereof as a debt due from the estate. Mrs. Butler, claiming her statutory rights as against the estate, it appearing that no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griesemer v. Boyer & RexWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In re Estate of AndrewsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Smith v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In re the Estate of LavenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Crawford v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of DillonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. In Re Schoenfeld's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Young v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Blethen v. Supervisor of the Inheritance Tax DivisionWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In re RashDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API