Legal Opinion

United States v. Kamel Khatib

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 15, 2015No. 14-2216UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Kamel Khatib was convicted at a bench trial of one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) after he received four firearms while he was under information for a felony. On appeal, Khatib claims that the district court violated the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, by allowing more than seventy non-excludable days to pass between his initial appearance and his trial. We affirm.

I. Background

Kamel Khatib was under a Wisconsin felony information for drug possession and skipping bail when he paid $2,000 for four AK-47 rifles. What Khatib did not realize was that the arms dealers were actually…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond Gwiazdzinski, United States of America v. Steven DreyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Frederick J. Morgan, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. BroadnaxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. SanchezDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  2. Eric L. Wakefield v. Franklin County Sheriff Department, David Bartoni, and Kyle Bacon; Eric L. Wakefield v. Franklin County Jail, Anthony Skobel, S. Barra, Kieth Lampley, Matt Pemberton, Ann Lytle, Frankie Valesquez, John Wheatley, Megan Duiguin, Mallory Kelley, Kenny Jacobs, Gage Darnell, Patricia Jackson, Gerald Dorris, Casey Jackson, Jacob Bartoni, and Zane YoungDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2026
  3. United States v. DyerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
  4. United States v. DyerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API