Fink v. Martin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J. cited Code of Pract. arts. 346, 360. 9 Mart. 459. 6 La. 457. 7 La. 178. 17 La. 84. 6iv. Code, arts. 1968, 1970, 1971, 1972. cited Civil Code, arts. 1965, 1967, 1972, 1973, 1989. 10 Mart. 605,.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
Slidell, J.
The plaintiff alleged that he was the dative testamentary executor of the succession of Sarah Baum; that, as such, he had recovered judgment against Martin, for a sum of $1,500 and upwards, in the Court of Probates, and had also claims against him for a still greater amount, upon which suit had been instituted and was pending in the Court of Probates. These claims, it is alleged, had been prosecuted in the Court of Probates against Martin, as the official surety of Powell, a former executor. The precise amount is not alleged either of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Houghteling v. FisherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Dupre v. RichardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
3Cited by1 opinion
- Siegel v. HelisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937