Lugar v. State ex rel. Lee
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1
OPINION DISSENTING IN PART; CONCURRING IN PART
2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · WhiteWhite, J.
Part 1(A) of the court’s opinion holds that the petition for extension of time which appellants filed on January 28,1976, one day before their time for filing their brief was to expire on January 29,1976, was timely filed. With that part of the court’s opinion, and only that part, I cannot agree.
In pertinent part Appellate Rule 14(A), which makes provision for extensions of time, requires that: “Except in appeals from interlocutory orders [which this is not], petitions for extensions of time shall be filed at least five days before the expiration…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Adams v. LeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- MEMBERS ETC. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- Lugar v. State ex rel. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978