Rider v. State

Smith, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for armed robbery and aggravated assault.

1. The trial court committed no manifest abuse of discretion in overruling appellant’s motion for mistrial, prompted by testimony which appellant elicited. Salisbury v. State, 222 Ga. 549 (2) (150 SE2d 819) (1966); Heard v. State, 142 Ga. App. 703 (4) (236 SE2d 911) (1977).

2. Appellant contends certain testimony was erroneously admitted. However, appellant raised no objection to the testimony below, and thus he will not be heard to complain on appeal.

3. We find no error in the trial court’s allowing the…