Scialdone v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
UPON REHEARING EN BANC
D. ARTHUR KELSEY, Judge.
The trial court found Claude M. Scialdone, Barry R. Taylor, and Edward S. Jones in contempt of court. On appeal, a panel of this Court held the evidence was sufficient to support the contempt findings. Scialdone v. Commonwealth, 51 Va.App. 679, 724-27, 660 S.E.2d 317, 340-41 (2008). The panel remanded the cases for retrial, however, ruling that the trial *230court improperly conducted a summary contempt proceeding and thereby deprived appellants of due process rights associated with plenary contempt. Id. at 718-24, 660 S.E.2d at 337-41.
At the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scialdone v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Scialdone v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009