Wenderoth v. Freeze
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
Perhaps the fundamental basis of my disagreement with the majority stems from a difference in concept as to the importance of the role of the Fort Smith City Planning Commission in this matter. After adoption, a zoning plan, which may be recommended by a city planning commission, is effectuated by a zoning ordinance adopted by the city governing board. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 18-2829 (Repl. 1968). Such an ordinance may be altered or amended by the council either with or without the recommendation of the city planning board. Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 19-2829, -2830 (Repl. 1968). The action of the city…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Little Rock v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Batesville v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Herring v. StannusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- State v. PollockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- City of Little Rock v. JoynerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.