Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wenderoth v. Freeze

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 13, 1970No. 5-5188Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

Perhaps the fundamental basis of my disagreement with the majority stems from a difference in concept as to the importance of the role of the Fort Smith City Planning Commission in this matter. After adoption, a zoning plan, which may be recommended by a city planning commission, is effectuated by a zoning ordinance adopted by the city governing board. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 18-2829 (Repl. 1968). Such an ordinance may be altered or amended by the council either with or without the recommendation of the city planning board. Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 19-2829, -2830 (Repl. 1968). The action of the city…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Little Rock v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Batesville v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Herring v. StannusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. State v. PollockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. City of Little Rock v. JoynerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API