Legal Opinion

Smith v. Allied Exterminators, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1971No. 7114IC109PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Appellants’ position on this appeal is that the mother of the deceased should have received no more than one-half the amount which she did receive. Appellant arrives at that conclusion by the following reasoning. G.S. 97-40 provides that if the deceased leaves no whole or partial dependents, then the compensation is to be commuted to its present value and paid to the next of kin, and the order of priority among the next of kin “shall be governed by the general law applicable to the distribution of the personal estate of persons dying intestate.” The applicable provision of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of IvesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Hardison v. W. H. Hampton & SonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Anderson v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Avery v. . BrantleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Crawford v. GENERAL INSURANCE AND REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Perdue v. Daniel International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Perdue v. Daniel International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API