Baumgold Bros. v. Schwarzschild Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
The issue is whether Special Term properly vacated the sheriff’s levy on defendant’s interest in the proceeds of an insurance policy solely because at the time of the levy defendant, the insured, had not filed proof of loss with the insurer.
Plaintiff, a wholesale jeweler, delivered to defendant, a Virginia corporation, jewelry of the agreed value of $64,119.45 under contract providing that the goods were at defendant’s risk against loss by any cause whatever. Defendant had $50,000 insurance against such loss under the policy in question issued by the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- McMaster v. . Pres., Etc., Ins. Co. of N. Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Herrmann & Grace v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Herrmann Grace v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Commission for Polish Relief, Ltd. v. Banca Nationala a RumanieiNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.