In re the Distribution of Fritchey's Estate
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
We are not prepared to say that the auditor’s report is erroneous in this case, but from its brief and meagre statement of facts it is unsatisfactory. We are inclined to believe, from a single expression used by the auditor, that he took an erroneous view of the alleged title of Mrs. Fritchey. “ He presumes it to be valid in the absence of sufficient evidence to the contrary.” The date of the deed is not given; but we infer that it was some time after the judgment was entered in favor of Mr. Haldeman.
It must be borne in mind, that long before that period Mr. Fritchey was indebted…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fox v. VanderbeckNew York Supreme Court · 1826
- Cutler v. CarpenterNew York Supreme Court · 1823