Legal Opinion

In re the Distribution of Fritchey's Estate

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided April 4, 1859Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

We are not prepared to say that the auditor’s report is erroneous in this case, but from its brief and meagre statement of facts it is unsatisfactory. We are inclined to believe, from a single expression used by the auditor, that he took an erroneous view of the alleged title of Mrs. Fritchey. “ He presumes it to be valid in the absence of sufficient evidence to the contrary.” The date of the deed is not given; but we infer that it was some time after the judgment was entered in favor of Mr. Haldeman.

It must be borne in mind, that long before that period Mr. Fritchey was indebted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fox v. VanderbeckNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  2. Cutler v. CarpenterNew York Supreme Court · 1823

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API