Legal Opinion

Dukes v. Eastern Tar Products Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 13, 1951No. [No. 138, October Term, 1950.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

Rubin Dukes met his death on June 28, 1945 by accidental means arising out of and in the course of his employment by the Eastern Tar Products Company. Hattie Camp Dukes, claiming to be his widow, filed a claim with the State Industrial Accident Commission on behalf of herself and three minor children. On June 20, 1946 the claim was disallowed, on the ground “that Hattie Dukes was not the lawful widow of Rubin Dukes, deceased, and that the said infant children, hereinbefore mentioned, were not dependent upon, nor members of the household of said Rubin Dukes, deceased, at the time of his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. FrederickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Harlan v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Bowman v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  5. Scott v. Independent Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maryland Ex Rel. Gliedman v. Capital Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Brooks v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  4. Hill v. HuddlestonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1967
  5. Redfern v. Holtite Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API