Legal Opinion
Amo v. Genovese
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 21, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 N.J. Super. 109 (1951)
85 A.2d 529
THEODORE AMO, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, IVAN J. AMO, IVAN J. AMO AND VIOLET J. AMO, INDIVIDUALLY, BEULAH LEADBITTER AND HAROLD LEADBITTER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
VITO GENOVESE AND PHILIP GENOVESE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 10, 1951.
Decided December 21, 1951.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE, and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. Joseph F. Mattice argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. Huyler E. Romond argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys).
The opinion of the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of MontclairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Brandon v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- State, Ex Rel. Beronio v. Pension CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Audubon Volunteer Fire Co. v. Church Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- State v. WinneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Zasada v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- State v. MadanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- State v. KaiserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.