United States v. Franklin v. Fennell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Hamilton, Circuit Judge.
*360 In federal criminal law, the amount of restitution for a fraud conviction depends on the victims' actual losses, regardless of whether the defendant intended larger losses. When imposing restitution, the district court must say enough about its loss calculation, under all the circumstances, to permit meaningful review. One mechanism for meeting those requirements is 18 U.S.C. § 3664 (a), which permits the court to order a detailed accounting by a probation officer.
Here, the evidence at Franklin Fennell's trial showed an actual loss amount of $110,600 in kickbacks that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Marvin Artley and Jerry McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. HassebrockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Bruce RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. James ScalzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Lloyd RoblCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Airrion S. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Dameion WyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Brian FennerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.