People v. Gregory
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding, disciplinary counsel and the attorney-respondent, Mark Stephen Gregory (Gregory or respondent), entered into a Stipulation of Facts which formed the basis for the Complaint. The respondent further stipulated that his conduct violated all of the sections of the Code of Professional Responsibility alleged in the Complaint and the specified Rules of the Supreme Court concerning discipline. The Hearing Board accepted the Stipulation, heard testimony in mitigation offered by the respondent, and made its recommendation that the respondent be suspended for a year and…
2Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GregorySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996