Swift v. Inland Nav. Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
In Equity. Suit by Edward A. Swift against the Inland Navigation Company, a corporation, and the Colman Dock Company, a corporation. On motion to dismiss as to Colman Dock Company, motion denied with leave to amend bill.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The bill of complaint states that the Inland Navigation Company is a Washington corporation, and that the Colman Dock Company is a Washington corporation, each having its principal place.of business in Seattle, Wash.; that the plaintiff is the owner of certain letters patent, and then charges “that the said Inland Navigation Company, a corporation, and the Colman Dock *376Company, a corporation, defendants herein * * * did * * * wrongfully malee, sell, use and cause to be made, sold and used, and is now selling, making and using, or causing to be made, used, or sold * * *…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barney v. LathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Gaines Et Ux. v. ChewSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Siemens Aktiengesellschaft v. Sonotone CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973