Legal Opinion

Grace v. Eisenhuth

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1933No. 4582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff’s petition sets out that on September 16,1931, while employed by Charles Eisen-huth and while working in the course of that employment, he suffered accidental injuries entitling him to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (No. 20 of 1914, as amended), for a period of 400 weeks, at the rate of 58.58 per week; that on March 11, 1932, he and his said employer filed a joint petition in the Twenty-Sixth judicial district court for the parish of Bossier wherein they erroneously alleged that petitioner was entitled to compensation for a period of 150 weeks, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. GlynnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Vance v. EllerbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Citizens' Bank v. JamesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
  4. Faircloth v. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Horney v. ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Ponder v. PechonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Hall v. &198tna Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API