Legal Opinion

Daniel Devine v. Bloomfield Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2017No. 330947Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DANIEL DEVINE, UNPUBLISHED May 30, 2017 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 330947 Oakland Circuit Court BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP and LEO SAVOIE, LC No. 2015-149016-CK Defendants-Appellees. Before: M. J. KELLY, P.J., and BECKERING and SHAPIRO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Daniel Devine, appeals as of right from the trial court’s order dismissing his claim against defendants, Bloomfield Township and Leo Savoie, under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.361 et seq., pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8) (failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted). For the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gorman v. American Honda Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Dolan v. Continental Airlines/Continental ExpressMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Johnson v. PastorizaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API