Legal Opinion

Davis v. Murphy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Davis brought suit against Murphy upon a contract, which is set out as follows, viz.:

“I, Joel Murphy, have this day bought of Nathan Davis, all the wheat he raises this season on his home farm, except enough for his bread and seed-wheat, for which I agree to pay one dollar, in good State Bank of Indiana or Ohio State Bank paper money, at the time of delivery, at Millville, Henry county, Indiana, which is to be between the first day of August and 10th day of September next. I agree to furnish a sufficient number of sacks at Millville when requested, by mail, and one week’s notice before the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard & Ryckman v. HoeyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Humphreys v. ComlineIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. Bertelson v. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Lester v. EastIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Scofield v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. Shipp v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API