Legal Opinion

Eagan v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Jennings Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Prosecution by affidavit and information against the appellant for giving intoxicating liquor to John Derringer, a person being in the habit of getting intoxicated. Motion to quash the affidavit overruled. Plea, not guilty. Jury trial. Verdict, guilty. Fine, ten dollars. Motion for *163a new trial overruled. Judgment. The appellant reserved exceptions to each ruling, and appeals to this court.

The affidavit and information charge that the appellant at, etc., on, etc., did “ sell, barter and give away intoxicating liquor to,” etc. It is urged upon us that the affidavit is bad for duplicity, because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Divine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Shafer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Carmon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McVayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. State v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Wasson v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Knopf v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hiatt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API