Legal Opinion · Dissent

Foodland v. State ex rel. WV Department of Health & Human Resources

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2000No. 26731Published

1DissentScott, Justice

(Filed June 22, 2000)

In its fervor to achieve a “fair” result, the majority has intervened inappropriately in an administrative matter and created a rule of law1 which is not only contrary to the controlling regulatory and contractual provisions, but detrimental to the very women, infants, and children for whose benefit the WIC Program exists. For these reasons, I dissent.

The federal regulations which govern the operation of the West Virginia WIC Program, as they existed at the time of Clay Foodland’s overcharge violation, provide: “The State agency shall establish policies which determine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barakat v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  2. Russell's Old Trading Post, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. United States Department of Agriculture, Food & Nutrition ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API