Legal Opinion
G. Warhit Real Estate, Inc. v. Krauss
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 19, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment affirmed, without costs.
We are in full accord with the views expressed by the court below. Public policy considerations would preclude estopping landlord from instituting the proceeding, and, in any event, we find nothing in the record which would warrant such an estoppel. As to the findings of fact made by the court, they are supported by the evidence adduced at trial.
Moreover, we agree that the failure to notify tenant of the *430intent not to renew the lease on primary residence ground during the "window” period (the period during which the landlord must…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MATTER OF 61 JANE ST. ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- 1015 Washington Ave. Mgt. Co. v. BlecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Walton v. Krismart Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crow v. 83rd Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- C.D.I. Associates v. LishansCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986
- Charlotte Realty Co. v. LubarskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1986
- One Vincent Road Realty Co. v. MulqueenYonkers City Court · 1989