California Fig-Syrup Co. v. Clinton E. Worden & Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
This is a suit in equity by tbe California Fig-Syrup Company to enjoin the defendants from making, selling, or offering for sale any liquid laxative preparation under tbe name “Syrup of Figs” or “Fig Syrup,” or under any name in colorable imitation of tbe name “Syrup of Figs” or “Fig Syrup.” Tbe cause was beard on a motion for a preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
Tbis is an order to sbow cause why a preliminary injunction should not be granted as prayed for in tbe bill of complaint. Tbe motion was beard upon tbe bill of complaint and affidavits in support thereof, and upon a demurrer to tbe complaint and counter affidavits. The bill alleges, among other things: That the complainant is a corporation created abd existing under tbe laws of tbe state of Nevada. That tbe defendant Clinton E. Worden & Oo. is a corporation created and existing under the laws of tbe state *213of California, a citizen of the state of California, and haying…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pillsbury v. Pillsbury Washburn Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Walter Baker & Co. v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Johnson & Johnson v. Bauer & BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
- Improved Fig Syrup Co. v. California Fig Syrup Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- California Fig-Syrup Co. v. WordenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899