Legal Opinion
Kinnell v. State of Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 24, 1981No. 79-3023, 80-3052PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
Petitioner Roily 0. Kinnell, having been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, has filed with the Clerk of the Court two petitions for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The two cases, No. 79-3023 and No. 80-3052, are herein consolidated for all purposes. Rule 42(a), F.R. Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.
Petitioner is currently serving a sentence of three to twenty years in the Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas, by virtue of his conviction in the District Court of Bourbon County, Kansas, on October 6, 1977, upon a jury verdict of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Jeffrey Linn Hall v. State of Iowa and Attorney General of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993