Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Move Organization v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 1981No. Civ. A. Nos. 80-3129, 80-3133PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GILES, District Judge.

The amended complaint in these civil rights actions raises serious procedural and jurisdictional deficiencies. The substance of these suits has been summarized in my Memorandum and Order dated October 28, 1980. Before addressing the problems in the amended complaint, I shall briefly relate the procedural history.

*522I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Jurisdiction

The original complaints contained no jurisdictional allegations. I ordered plaintiffs to correct this problem. Order, dated October 28, 1980, ¶ 2. The Amended Complaint, ¶ 4, alleges that: “This Court has…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. LUIS MARTINEZ-McBEAN, Appellant v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. John Arthur DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Kelly v. Delaware River Joint CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Amader v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Move Organization v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. In Re TrinseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Hall v. DorseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API