Legal Opinion

England v. Sanford

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law in granting plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint. In the absence of such abuse, this Court has no power to review the grant of a discretionary remedy. Hence, the only remaining issue presented by the question certified is whether the Appellate Division had the power to grant the requested relief. We…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garrison v. Wm. H. Clark Municipal Equipment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Walker v. Pepsico, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Vamos v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1995
  4. Mortka v. K-Mart Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. ComptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API