Legal Opinion

State v. Pansegrau

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided August 25, 1994No. 93-1635PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SACKETT, Judge.

Defendant-appellant James Harry Panse-grau appeals his conviction of third-degree sexual abuse following a jury trial. He contends the trial court abused its discretion by permitting the introduction of rebuttal testimony of Dr. Cheryl Leytham concerning rape trauma syndrome. We reverse and remand.

The alleged victim claimed to have been raped by defendant while he was showing her around the plant where they both worked. The tour occurred early in her seven and one-half hour work shift. The alleged victim testified she was dressed in shorts and a shirt when defendant took her to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  2. State v. GettierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. State v. BrothertonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. State v. MayberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. State v. WindsorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. State v. MacRaeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. Christopher John Simpson, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
  4. State of Iowa v. Hillary TylerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
  5. State of Iowa v. Jill TjernagelCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API