Legal Opinion

People v. Wolst

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 2004No. 1-02-2878 RelPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBRIDE

Defendant, Raymond Wolst, suffers from paranoid schizophrenia. In 1996, defendant shot and killed a stranger in a health club while under the delusional belief that the victim was a federal agent. While initially found unfit for trial, defendant was subsequently found fit and not guilty by reason of insanity in November 1997. Defendant was thereafter confined to Elgin Mental Health Center. On January 23, 2002, the facility director at Elgin recommended that defendant be transferred to a nonsecure setting and that he be granted supervised off-grounds and unsupervised on-grounds pass…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GundersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. People v. GundersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. People v. BethkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API