Legal Opinion · Dissent

James T. Conti v. Pneumatic Products Corporation and H. Michael McCurry

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1992No. 91-3918Published

1DissentBoggs, Circuit Judge

Today the majority holds that the United States Constitution prevents the district court from exercising jurisdiction in this case pursuant to the Ohio long-arm statute. A consideration of the facts before us and the precedents of the Supreme Court and of this Circuit does not support the majority’s conclusion. This is especially true given that this ease is at a very early stage and, in this Circuit, the plaintiff is only required to make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction in order to defeat dismissal. Further, in analyzing the pleadings at this stage, the court must construe them in a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API