Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Evans

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1992No. 91-264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant has filed a motion to permit him to file handwritten briefs, alleging that he is without access to a typewriter. We have held that permission to file handwritten briefs will be granted when a litigant makes a showing that a typewriter is not available and that his suit has substantial merit. Patterson v. State, 289 Ark. 564, 712 S.W.2d 922 (1986). Appellant is incarcerated under concurrent sentences for aggravated robbery and criminal use of a prohibited weapon. The judgment of conviction was affirmed in Gonzales v. State, 301 Ark. 98, 782 S.W.2d 359 (1990).

Appellant is now…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. George v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Patterson v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Gonzales v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McConaughy v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. McConaughy v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API