Legal Opinion

Gimbert v. Rowley

Norfolk Chancery Court, Virginia

Decided December 9, 1964No. Case No. (Law) 9013Published

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE WALTER A. PAGE

I have considered the argument of counsel on the defendant’s motion to file a late answer in the above-styled case.

The question of the allowance of further time is in the sound discretion of the court. Where there is a showing of neglect and carelessness on the part of the party this does not constitute a reasonable or legal excuse. See Cooper v. Davis, 199 Va. 472 (1957). This also has been held to be true where no motion was made for an extension of time and no excuse or reason offered for the delay. See Levine v. Lacy, 204 Va. 297 (1963).

In the instant case the party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. May v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  2. Levine v. LacySupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  3. Cooper v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  4. Williams v. Service Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API