Legal Opinion

Halpern v. Armstrong

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 28, 1980No. 77 CIV. 2781 (MP)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND OPINION

MILTON POLLACK, District Judge.

This derivative action against Revlon, Inc. and its directors has been submitted for judgment as to liability on stipulated facts. Jurisdiction is posited on diversity and on questions arising under the federal securities laws.

In a stipulation entered into by the parties on April 9, 1979, and filed on June 22, 1979, it was agreed that “this action shall be adjudicated with the same force and effect as if a trial had been held on the issue of liability and the . . . agreed facts and exhibits constituted the evidence at said trial.” The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  3. Dillon v. BergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  4. Freedman v. BarrowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Len J. Dillon v. F. Steven BergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Samuel M. Feinberg Testamentary Trust v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Tracinda Corp. v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AGDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  3. In Re Reliance Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2000
  4. In Re Reliance Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2001
  5. In Re Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API