Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 18, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an indictment and conviction of assault with intent to ravish. Sentence was fixed by the trial court at twelve years' imprisonment. The appellant is represented by court appointed counsel both at trial and on appeal.

At trial there was no motion to exclude the evidence presented by the state, no motion for a directed verdict or request for an affirmative charge, and no exception to the oral charge of the court. The motion for new trial did not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence that the appellant is guilty as charged is undisputed. The record reveals…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Seibold v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Tillis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Rohn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beauregard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Glass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Ponder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Beauregard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Woodall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API