Krawchuk v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Blatt :
The principal and determinative issue in this case is whether or not the decedent suffered an injury “arising in the course of his employment.” I am convinced that he did and must, therefore, respectfully dissent.
In construing the meaning of the words " arising in the course of his employment,” I would follow the approach of Professor Larson, an eminent authority in *607the field of workmen’s compensation law, who suggests
a careful reading of the exact phrasing of the present coverage formula. It does not say that the injury must ‘occur’ or ‘be manifested’ or ‘be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Plasteel Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Borough of Throop v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975