Legal Opinion
State v. Hardesty
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 2002No. 26818PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge.
James C. Hardesty appeals from the district court’s appellate decision reversing the magistrate’s order granting Hardesty’s motion to present expert testimony. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Hardesty was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), I.C. § 18-8004(l)(a), after his breath test indicated .15 percent and .14 percent breath alcohol concentration. The state alleged that Hardesty was di'iving while having an alcohol coneen tration of .08 percent or more as shown by analysis of his breath.
Hardesty filed a motion to allow expert testimony at trial. Hardesty…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BeardIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LentAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010
- State v. Wade Allen TomlinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. Jay Alton RoachIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- Morris v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Carlos Adrian Cruz-RomeroIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.