Legal Opinion

Baldwin's Bank v. Morris

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term, Yates county. Action on a promissory note by Baldwin’s Bank of Penn Yan against W. T. Morris and others. Verdict for plaintiff. From an order denying a new trial, defendant Morris appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The action, so far as this appeal is concerned, was on a promissory note for $500, dated February 28, 1883, made by one Farmer to the order of the Farmer Manufacturing Company, and indorsed by that com-*287pony, and also by Ealph T. Wood in the firm name of Wood, Butler & Morris. That firm name represented an existing copartnership, of which Wood and the defendant Morris were members, formed for the practice of the law, at the village of Penn Tan; and the question on this appeal is of the authority of Wood to bind the defendant Morris by the indorsement mentioned. The note was the second renewal…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burchell v. VoghtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API