Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sibbitt v. R. & W. Transit Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1942PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDevin, J.

This was an action by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been proximately caused by the negligence of the defendant. The defendant denied that it was negligent, and also entered the alternative plea of contributory negligence in bar of recovery. At the close of all the evidence the court sustained the motion of the defendant for a judgment as in case of nonsuit (C. S., 567), and from judgment accordant with such ruling the plaintiff appealed, assigning error. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, it tends to show that on the night…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Lee v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Hughes v. . LutherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Cox v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Atkins v. White Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Austin v. . OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API