Legal Opinion

Nielson v. Okies

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1973No. 6336PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PRESLAR, Chief Justice.

This is an action for recovery of damages to property which plaintiff-Appellee leased to defendant-Appellant. Plaintiff alleged that the defendant caused damage to the leased building when he vacated it at the end of the term. In a trial without a jury, the trial Court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $2,000.00. We are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.

The trial Court filed findings of fact which support the judgment rendered if the findings are in fact supported by the evidence. Appellant raises by no evidence and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pasadena State Bank v. IsaacTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Harrell v. F. H. Vahlsing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Paul v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pulley v. Milberger, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  2. Z.A.O., Inc. v. Yarbrough Drive Center Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2001
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Croft, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  4. Chemical Express Carriers, Inc. v. French, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  5. Anthony Equipment Corp. v. Irwin Steel Erectors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API