Legal Opinion

Miller v. Blackwell

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 27, 2004No. C-1-04-735PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 'A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND THE MOTION TO INTERVENE OF KEVIN CRAFT AND GREG LAWSON

DLÓTT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (doc. # 2) and the Motion to Intervene of Kevin Craft and Greg Lawson (doc. # 5). Plaintiffs Amy Miller, Mindi Haddix, and the Ohio Democratic Party (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed both the Complaint for Declaratory and Injunc-tive Relief (doc. # 1) and the Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (doc. #2) on October 26, 2004. . For the reasons set…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Indiana Democratic Party v. RokitaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2006
  2. Cincinnati Golf Management, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Adams v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Prentzler v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. League of Women Voters of Ohio v. BlackwellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API