Joseph Bontempo v. Peter Fenton, Warden, Rahway State Penitentiary, and James R. Zazzali, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentSloviter, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority that the state trial proceedings in this case were “unusual” and “unorthodox.” In fact, that is a restrained understatement. Possibly as a result of the “unusual” nature of the proceedings, the usual precautions which have evolved to guarantee a defendant’s constitutional rights were not followed. Therefore, I agree with the district court that a new trial is required.
Without detailing all of the proceedings of the trial, some of which are referred to in the majority’s opinion, I highlight the salient events. Contrary to the prevailing view, the state trial judge was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.