Legal Opinion

Ætna Ins. Co. v. Waco Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1920No. 140-3061PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, J.

This case is ruled by the decisions in McPherson v. Camden Fire Insurance Co., 222 S. W. 211, and Providence Washington Insurance Co. v. Levy & Rosen, 222 S. W. 216, decided by Section A of the Commission of Appeals. The questions involved are the constitutionality of chapter 106 of the Thirty-Third Legislature (Vernon’s Sayles’ Ann. Civ. St. 1914, arts. 4874a, 4874b), and the applicability of said act to the defense relied on to defeat the insurance policy sued on, namely, that the insured had taken out additional insurance in excess of that allowed under a concurrent insurance clause, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McPherson v. Camden Fire Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Providence-Washington Ins. Co. v. LevyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  3. &198tna Ins. Co. v. Waco Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Underwriters' Agency of Fire Insurance Ass'n of Philadelphia v. DriggersTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Humphrey v. National Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. National Fire Ins. v. CarterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Kelley v. American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API