Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In the Interest of L.M. v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1992No. 89-CA-0212Published

1ConcurrenceRoy Noble Lee, Chief Justice

I concur with the majority opinion, but I think more should be said about carrying concealed weapons.

One of the first cases I undertook as a young lawyer was the defense of a man charged with carrying a concealed weapon. I thought his defense would be simple and easy until I learned what the statute meant. To my amazement, I discovered that carrying a concealed weapon in whole or in part even meant that a revolver carried in a holster on a man’s hip was a partially concealed weapon, riding a horse with a saddle holster and revolver under a person’s leg violated the statute; and that covering…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Town of HeidelbergMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McGuirk v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Patterson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API