Loudd v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
These are appeals from convictions for robbery. The appellants were tried jointly after each entered a plea of guilty. The jury assessed the punishment of each at fifty years.
The sole contention of the appellants is that the court did not admonish them of the consequences of their pleas of guilty.
After the appellants expressed a desire to plead guilty, the court stated:
“All right. — I guess I should admonish you, just like each one of you — you realize that by pleading guilty, that the jury must find you guilty upon your — upon the introduction of sufficient evidence,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ex Parte BattenfieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
3Cited by18 opinions
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Alvarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.