Legal Opinion
Seales v. Mirabal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 17, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the appellant, Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated December 22, 1986, which found that the petitioner tenant had not been overcharged for rent, the appeal, by permission, is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), entered July 17, 1987, which remitted the matter to the appellant for a de novo determination as to whether the landlord had collected from the tenant rents in excess of the amounts allowed by law.
Ordered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Albano v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Mid-State Management Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- MATTER OF MID-STATE MGMT. CORP. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stein v. Rent Guidelines BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- 47-40 41st Realty Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Sterling Ridge Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Cooper Realty Co. v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Woytisek v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- S. R. Demetrious v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.