Legal Opinion

Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Mattson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1924No. 4094PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This is an action upon the official bond of defendant David Mattson, as secretary of state for the state of Utah, between the 1st day of January, 1916, and the 1st day of January, 1917, to recover the sum of $20,382, collected by him from plaintiff during said period. The other defendants are sureties for the secretary of state, and the bond sued upon is made part of the complaint.

It is alleged by plaintiff that the money was collected by the defendant Mattson in pursuance of Comp. Laws Utah 1917, title 110, chapters 1 and 2, for and on account of trading stamps sold and delivered by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryus v. GrubleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. State v. HoltgreveUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Centennial Eureka Mining Co. v. Juab CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
  5. Raleigh v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sperry Hutchinson Co. v. Harden BennionUtah Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API