Legal Opinion

De Long Hook & Eye Co. v. Francis Hook & Eye & Fastener Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York

Decided June 26, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This action is brought to-enjoin the defendant from selling and exposing for sale hooks and eyes stitched upon cards together with what are known as “invisible eyes,” and which cards bear letters, words, and pictures arranged in simulation of complainant’s previously adopted method of introducing its commodity to the trade. Complainant claims that the defendant placed its merchandise upon the market in a form calculated to mislead the ordinary purchaser into the belief that its goods were those of complainant. Although complainant also used upon its cards the registered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Waltham Watch Co. v. United States Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. N. K. Fairbank Co. v. R. W. Bell Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  3. Pillsbury v. Pillsbury Washburn Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  4. N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Luckel, King & Cake Soap Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  5. Fuller v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buffalo Specialty Co. v. Van CleefCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  2. Howard Dustless Duster Co. v. CarletonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1915
  3. Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. Wallach Bros.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API