Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jones v. Laughlin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application for a writ of prohibition;

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition against! the respondent; as judgé of the St. Louis Criminal Court, to restrain him from entering a judgment or order disbarring the relator from' practicing his. profession as an attorney-at-law in said court. We have not had the advantage of an oral argument, nor have counsel on either side favored ■ us with a brief, or with the citation of any authorities > touching the application, but both parties have seen fit to submit it upon the petition and the return. “This practice,” the Supreme Court has said, “ cannot be endured.” Disse v. Frank,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thomson v. . TracyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Buskirk v. Judge of Circuit CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Ex parte GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. Ex parte HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  5. Ex parte PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fenn v. RileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Clay v. Chicago & Alton RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Forsee v. GatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API