Legal Opinion

Holly v. County of Chautauqua

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 2010No. 61 SSM 58PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on their Labor Law § 240 (1) claim denied. The certified question should be answered in the negative.

While we agree with the Appellate Division that there are no questions of fact regarding proximate cause, triable issues of fact do exist as to whether the scaffolding defendants supplied provided proper protection under Labor Law § 240 (1) (see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City, 1 NY3d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Davis v. BrunswickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Medina-Arana v. Henry St. Prop. Holdings, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Kopasz v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. KOPASZ, TIM v. CITY OF BUFFALOAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Kopasz v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API