Holly v. County of Chautauqua
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on their Labor Law § 240 (1) claim denied. The certified question should be answered in the negative.
While we agree with the Appellate Division that there are no questions of fact regarding proximate cause, triable issues of fact do exist as to whether the scaffolding defendants supplied provided proper protection under Labor Law § 240 (1) (see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City, 1 NY3d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Davis v. BrunswickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- Medina-Arana v. Henry St. Prop. Holdings, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Kopasz v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- KOPASZ, TIM v. CITY OF BUFFALOAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Kopasz v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017