Legal Opinion · Dissent

New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 1990Published

1Dissent

Mahoney, P. J., and Levine, J.,

dissent in a memorandum by Mahoney, P. J. Mahoney, P. J. (dissenting). We respectfully dissent. Dr. Antero Lacot, upon whose medical report the majority relies, was not a cardiologist, had no special training in cardiology and did not perform an exhaustive examination of respondent Peter Ramos (hereinafter respondent). For example, no stress test was performed on respondent. On the other hand, Dr. Richard Devereux, a cardiologist who performed an extensive examination of respondent, reported that respondent would have no difficulty discharging the duties of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Division of Human Rights v. County of Onondaga Sheriff's DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Cullen v. Nassau County Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. New York City Board of Education v. BatistaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Moore v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API