Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Zeh

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1966PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, upon the opinion at the Appellate Division, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Concur; Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Van Voorhis, Bergan and Keating. Judges Fuld, Burke and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse upon the authority of Hermann v. Ludwig (229 N. Y. 544); Tutunjian v. Vetzigian (299 N. Y. 315); Rich v. Mottek (11 N Y 2d 90).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tutunjian v. VetzigianNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Hermann v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of Opal v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  2. Glass v. BattistaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Dannhardt v. DonnellyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  4. In re Di SienaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. In re the Estate of BainerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API