Reed v. Reed
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDel Sole, Judge
Following the trial court’s order of November 8, 1984, dismissing exceptions to the Master’s recommendations, the only thing left for the court to do was to enter a final decree. Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1920.55(c) provides as follows:
If exceptions are filed, the court shall hear argument on the exceptions and enter an appropriate final decree. No Motion for Post-Trial Relief may be filed to the final decree.
The procedural morass in this case was occasioned by the trial court’s failure to enter a decree once it dismissed the exceptions.
I would vacate all of the orders entered from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PfenderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Gellar v. ChambersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Vendale Coal Co. v. Voto Manufacturing Sales Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986